Showing posts with label Serena Williams. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Serena Williams. Show all posts

Thursday, October 04, 2018

Serena Williams to face Roger Federer & Belinda Bencic in Hopman Cup doubles next year

Serena Williams is set to face Roger Federer in her first event of the 2019 season when the USA play Switzerland in the mixed doubles at the Hopman Cup.

Williams, 37, has not played since her controversial US Open final defeat by Naomi Osaka in September.

The 23-time Grand Slam champion partners Frances Tiafoe, while 20-time Grand Slam winner Federer and Belinda Bencic will seek to defend their title.

Cameron Norrie and Katie Boulter will represent Great Britain in Perth.

"The Aussie fans are always so warm and supportive and the Hopman Cup has always given me a great start to the season, especially ahead of the Australian Open," said Williams, who pulled out of this month's China Open.

Williams will be playing in Australia for the first time since winning the 2017 Australian Open while eight weeks pregnant, having missed last year's tournament as she was not fully fit to return following the birth of daughter Olympia.

The Hopman Cup runs from 29 December until 5 January, with the 2019 Australian Open taking place from 14-27 January.

The mixed team event features eight nations split into two groups, with teams facing each other in sessions that consist of a men's and women's singles match and a mixed doubles match.

Each team plays the other three in their group, and the top teams in each group then meet in the final.

The USA are due to meet Switzerland on New Year's Day in Group B, which also features Great Britain and Greece.

Group A consists of France, Spain, Germany and hosts Australia.

Federer, 37, and Bencic, 21, won Switzerland's first Hopman Cup since 2001 earlier this year.
Teams

Group A

France - Lucas Pouille and Alize Cornet

Spain - David Ferrer and Garbine Muguruza

Germany - Alexander Zverev and Angelique Kerber

Australia
- Matt Ebden and Ashleigh Barty

Group B

Great Britain - Cameron Norrie and Katie Boulter

Greece - Stefanos Tsitsipas and Maria Sakkari

Switzerland - Roger Federer and Belinda Bencic

USA - Frances Tiafoe and Serena Williams

Monday, August 31, 2015

Roger Federer Nike Street Tennis in NYC

NEW YORK, NY, USA - In a reboot of their classic commercial from the '90s, Nike hosted a new edition of Nike Street Tennis in New York City on Monday to celebrate the start of the 2015 US Open.

The WTA stars were out in full force, with Serena Williams, Maria Sharapova, Eugenie Bouchard and WTA Rising Star Madison Keys all there, and a slew of ATP World Tour stars were there too, including Roger Federer, Rafael Nadal, Grigor Dimitrov, Pete Sampras, Andre Agassi and John McEnroe.















Roger and the girls in NYC

Sunday, August 16, 2015

Belinda Bencic stuns Serena Williams to reach Rogers Cup final in Toronto!

It’s become the mantra of playing against Serena Williams, the pre-emptive shoulder-shrug: “I’ve got nothing to lose.”


And then, predictably, they lose.


But nobody would have predicted this.


So long, Serena.


For the first time since 2009, there will be no Ms Williams, S., in Toronto for Sunday’s final of the Rogers Cup, a tour-stop she’s all but owned.


This is a slam-bam shocker, a rift cracking open, zig-zagging across the tennis landscape.


Teenager Belinda Bencic — often gauche, occasionally petulant, not infrequent inflictor of gross bodily harm against tennis racquets — knocked the veteran out of the tournament, out of town, and clear off her perch of invincibility.


With fan-boy-in-chief and longtime family friend Drake looking on morosely, SNAP went Williams’ 14-match win streak in T.O., 3-6, 7-5, 6-4, a confrontation that careered from a zip-blah 33-minute first set to a jaw-dropping comeback second set, to a break-riddled and double-fault littered, yet gutsy third set. Williams reached down in that final set for a fistful of her signature resilience, the no-quit dame we saw at the French Open, while her adversary clung tenaciously to an unsuspected depth of nerve.


Bencic, all of 18 years old, was relentless and merciless, even as she squandered what had seemed like too many opportunities to put Williams away in a third set which the Miss Swiss 2.0 had led 4-0, including a second game where the American had been schneided to love.


“I have nothing to lose,” Bencic had said the previous night, after dumping quarter-final opponent Ana Ivanovic, merely the fifth seed.


Williams, of course, was seeded first here — No. 1 in the world rankings, like forever.


Yet Bencic matched the 33-year-old for power and put immense pressure on Williams’ first serve, which went suddenly and unusually awry, disastrous actually. In the end, not even 16 signature aces could alter the swing of things.


“I cannot believe it now,” a teary and clearly gobsmacked Bencic said, while still on the court and with fireworks exploding overhead.


Turning to her gum-chewing, burst-his-buttons coach-dad: “Thank you for everything. Also to my mom. She is home.”


This as Williams was packing up her dolls and dishes, also the racquet she too had earlier destroyed in a fit of pique, and marching off the court with a wave — index finger extended, as if to remind she’s still the One, still No. 1 — to the crowd.


That audience first pulled for the underdog, the largely unheralded yet hard-charging Bencic from the nation of cuckoo clocks, chocolate, and tennis colossi, and then, as the outcome loomed, returned their affections to Williams. Because nobody likes to see a champion humbled. And there were several passages in this match when the upstart did precisely that to her elder by 15 years.


“Today was not my day,” Williams stated bluntly afterwards. “I think I played really crappy today. I’ll try to be politically correct. And I don’t think you’ll disagree.


“I played like an amateur, to be honest.”


Harsh. But not incorrect, certainly by her own standards, that level of unsurpassed excellence which many had reckoned would bring Williams a fourth Rogers Cup title, en route to the U.S. Open next month and all-but-assumed completion of a calendar Grand Slam — ownership of all four major championships in the same year.


“I was just really struggling with my serve. Everything was off, my toss was off.”


She graciously gave full credit to Bencic — this was only the teen’s second tour title — who she’d earlier this week described as the future of women’s tennis. She didn’t use the heavy tape on her right hand either — sprained fingers, suffered in her quarter-final win over Roberta Vinci — as an excuse. “I can play with swollen fingers. I don’t think it should take away from anybody’s win.”


Serena lifted her head up — unbowed, of course — to heap further praise on the girl who’d vanquished her. “I was proud of her. She did a really good job.”


Bencic’s own head was spinning. “I always told myself, it’s Serena Williams. I’m not going to expect she’s going to hand to me the match. I expect that’s she’s going to put up a great fight.’’


Up or down, hardly ever the latter, Williams remains an unstoppable — if, yes, beatable — force who still defies time and injury and wear, un-waning.


Looking goddess fabulous in the pages of The New Yorker fall fashion issue, whether poured into a curve-hugging sheath or flashing lithe in full frontal splits — thighs that could crack walnuts — or barely clad in maillot with cutout midriff revealing washboard abs. Designer chic, from the tennis fashionista diva (in every age phase of her career) who, with sister Venus, gave us clacking cornrow beads, black lace, rhinestone tiaras and knee-high sneaker boots.


Straight outta Compton. Except — not really. That’s the legend. The reality: Transplanted to the broken-glass littered concrete courts in Compton from the middle-class comfort of Long Beach, California, because dad Richard believed that rough environment would toughen up his girls, daughters conceived to launch a focused assault against the white, rich, privileged tennis establishment.


Well, awesomeness has its privileges too. Among them, an aura of the unconquerable: She who can’t be beaten.


Which probably hasn’t been so great for the sport, where once there had been a group in the top 10 who could always contend, mano-a-mano against Williams. Justine Henin was one of them. “When I was playing, I had the feeling that you were in the last 16 and really everyone could win the tournament. It was a great generation.’’


Now it’s over and over again Serena Williams vs. The World — or . . . fill in the finals blank.


But on this Sunday, Serena Williams’ name will be missing from the proceedings, as Bencic squares off against Romania’s Simona Halep, winner of the other semi yesterday.


Henin, formally inducted into the Rogers Cup Hall of Fame on the weekend, had a decade-plus rivalry with Williams, in another era. She remains in awe of the woman but never in thrall. Today’s women, she suggested, are de facto cowed, cowering across the net from Williams.


“I wish the girls can be more consistent and believe that they can beat Serena, because some players proved in the past that it is possible. I think they don’t believe in it enough. When you want to beat Serena, you need to be at your best all the time. First, you have to believe that you can do it.”


Bencic believed, even if she kept saying she couldn’t believe it.


Funny, in retrospect, that after Halep’s 6-4, 6-4 triumph over Italy’s Sara Errani, much of the press conference questioning focused on her presumed showdown with Williams 24 hours later. No one game more than a passing mention to Bencic, who’d already sent two of the top five seeds packing.


“I just want to believe that I have a chance,” Halep had said. “But I go without pressure. I have nothing to lose, just playing against No. 1 in the world.”


Make that No. 20 in the world.


No. 1 has left the building.

thestar.com

Thursday, July 23, 2015

Roger Federer named most marketable sports star

Roger Federer has been named the world’s most marketable sports star, edging out Tiger Woods, Phil Mickelson and LeBron James in the Top 20 list released by the London School of Marketing.

The study calculated the brand value of the athletes, taking into account their current income from sponsorships as a percentage of their total earnings, and also factored in their social media presence.

"Roger is genuine, honest, down to earth, and gives his time generously to his partners and foundation. Companies look for role models and Roger is as good as it gets,” Tony Godsick, CEO TEAM8, told ATPWorldTour.com.

Tennis players featured prominently in the list, with a total of seven athletes represented. In addition to Federer, four other ATP World Tour players made the cut: Novak Djokovic (No. 7), Rafael Nadal (No. 8), Andy Murray (No. 16) and Kei Nishikori (No. 17).

1. Roger Federer – Tennis
2. Tiger Woods – Golf
3. Phil Mickelson – Golf
4. LeBron James – Basketball
5. Kevin Durant – Basketball
6. Rory McIlroy – Golf
7. Novak Djokovic – Tennis
8. Rafael Nadal – Tennis

9. Mahendra Singh Dhoni – Cricket
10. Cristiano Ronaldo – Football
11. Kobe Bryant – Basketball
12. Maria Sharapova – Tennis
13. Lionel Messi – Football
14. Usain Bolt – Track
15. Neymar – Football
16. Andy Murray – Tennis
17. Kei Nishikori – Tennis

18. Derrick Rose – Basketball
19. Floyd Mayweather – Boxing
20. Serena Williams – Tennis

Friday, March 27, 2015

The Williams sisters name Martina Hingis as one of their greatest rivals

Venus and Serena Williams continue to solidify their status as the most successful sister act in sports.

Which players do the Williams sisters regard as the best they've ever faced?

Given the fact both Venus and Serena have played the best of the best of each generation for the past two decades, it's not a question that's easily answered.

Both Venus and Serena named two Hall of Famers who have hit the courts in Indian Wells this week,Martina Hingis and Lindsay Davenport, as the best non-Williams opponents.

Both Grand Slam champions have been busy in the desert.

Hingis has partnered Sania Mirza to the BNP Paribas Open doubles semifinals. Davenport, who made her on-court coaching debut with charge Madison Keys earlier this week, covers the tournament daily as a Tennis Channel analyst.

Asked to identify the best non-Williams opponent she faced, Serena paused as if preparing to hear the "Final Jeopardy" song while running through leading candidates in her mind.

Eventually, Serena named four players: Davenport, Hingis, Steffi Graf, whom Serena beat to win her first Indian Wells title in 1999, and Monica Seles. Former No. 1 Seles has cited Serena the greatest player of all time.

"Okay. I have played a lot of people," Serena told the media in Indian Wells after defeating Sloane Stephens. "I'm like... I have a whole load of people. Let me think. I'm starting in the '90s and thinking in the '90s and then 2000s. It's so hard to say. I have played so many great players from Hingis to Davenport, Monica, Steffi. I have played some unbelievably tough players. It's a weird position.

"I think I have been able to play so many different generations that I don't think I could just give one answer. I have played Henin, who has been amazing. Monica was great. Lindsay. Hingis, she was also a super tough opponent.It's kind of hard to just say one person."

A 17-year-old Serena defeated then world No. 1 Hingis, 6-3, 7-6 (4) to capture her first career Grand Slam championship at the 1999 U.S. Open. Serena held a 7-6 career edge over the Swiss Miss.


In an interview with Tennis Now earlier this month, Venus said she regards Serena, Hingis and Davenport as her greatest rivals.

"You know what? I think that I played Martina and Serena and Lindsay the most so those were my greatest rivals," Venus told Tennis Now.

Hingis' creative court sense, flair for finesse and ability to create absurd angles were elements of the distinctive style that made her the youngest world No. 1 in tennis history. One of the few players to hold the singles and doubles top spot simultaneously, Hingis has said both sisters were her toughest rivals and called Venus her favorite rival.

"I liked playing Venus. I think it always brought out the best in both of us," Hingis said. "Serena is one of the only top rivals of my time that I don’t have a winning record against. We had some great matches. Lindsay is another one where I started off pretty well against her and then she started beating up on me—she’s four years older than me—(laughs) and then it got kind of even at the end.

"I would say the toughest rivals for me were players who had big serves and could hit winning shots off the first ball. Those were the type of players I can honestly say I really don’t like facing. You have to be 100 percent at all times to deal with those kind of players."

Monday, July 01, 2013

WTA 40 Love Celebration Event

Posted about this back in early June. Here's the whole lovely event with all the past and current #1's :) Thanks Billie Jean King!.

Friday, June 21, 2013

Serena Williams is not and never will be the "Greatest of All Time"

When it comes to sporting acronyms, the US has given birth to a few great ones.
We're pretty familiar with MVP by now; we know we're in for a long ride if it's OT; things get noisy around NASCAR; and you never want to be DQ'd.
Some need a bit of explanation, like AOL (All Outta Luck), BTE (Best Tournament Ever) and BLOW (Beautiful Ladies of Wrestling, obviously). Others have even come to be re-named, hence the NFL is often referred to as the No Fun League.
But now we have the latest word in the acronym vernacular - the G.O.A.T., or Greatest of All Time. And we're increasingly seeing (or hearing) it in connection with Serena Williams.
With the world No 1 currently on an unbeaten 31-match run and a prohibitive favourite for a fourth Wimbledon crown in five years, it might seem a valid question.
Except for the mountain of evidence that positively screams: this is the lowest quality women's tennis in more than 40 years.
Let me explain.
Much is made of the fact Serena has won three of the last four Grand Slam events and, at the "ripe old age" of 31, she now has 16 major titles in an 18-year pro career. She also dominated virtually the whole of 2002-03, claiming five of the six Slams she competed in during a truly golden spell (she was absent injured for the other two).
Signs of greatness, indeed. But take a closer look at the recent run, and things look a little less than stellar. She won this year's French Open for the loss of exactly ONE set. She breezed through the first four rounds dropping only 10 GAMES, then ambled through the semi-final and final for the loss of only nine more.
Competitive? Not exactly.
Last year's US Open was just as much of a cakewalk, with her only challenge coming in the Final from Victoria Azarenka. Last year's Wimbledon? A bit tougher - three matches that required three sets, plus a battling semi-final win over Azarenka.
But it's a recurring theme in women's tennis in recent years. There is precious little challenge in the first week, and not a whole lot more in the second. The strength in depth just isn't there - witness the almost non-stop parade of No 1s not called Williams in the past 10 years: Justine Henin, Lindsay Davenport, Anastasia Myskina, Kim Clijsters, Jelena Jankovic, Caroline Wozniacki, Petra Kvitova and Azarenka.
With the exception of Henin and Clijsters, they are not exactly an all-star cast, while several are barely household names in their own houses. And that's the supposed crème de la crème.

Threat

The only real surprise is that Serena hasn't won EVERY title going, when she's been fully fit. Certainly her sister is no longer a threat. Venus hasn't been a contender, mainly for health reasons, in five years. And apart from her dominant spell of four Grand Slam wins in 2000-01, it's arguable if she has ever been a serious obstacle to her sibling's success on the biggest stages, losing an amazing six of eight major finals to Serena - including ALL FIVE in 02-03.
Then contrast that lack of competitive balance in the past decade with the 1990s, 80s or even the 70s.
Go back to the mid-1990s, as the mantle of greatness passed from Martina Navratilova to Steffi Graf and Martina Hingis and you immediately notice one thing - there were no gimmes at the top.
Navratilova was no longer a major force, even though she claimed an unprecedented ninth Wimbledon title in 1994, but Graf faced challenges from Monica Seles, Jennifer Capriati, Jana Novotna and Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario, as well as the up-and-coming Hingis. Even the likes of Mary Pierce and Conchita Martinez were a serious threat on their day.
That's eight genuine contenders at every event, year in, year out. You're lucky if you can scrape together four at any tournament in the last 10 years.
Go back to the 80s and things were even tougher. Navratilova was a true colossus of the game but she certainly didn't have things all her own way, especially in the tough French Open (which has also eluded Serena in all but two of 12 attempts).
There was still Chris Evert to deal with, the precocious Hana Mandlikova, Gabriela Sabatini, Sanchez-Vicario and the almost irresistible force of Fraulein Forehand, Steffi Graf herself, plus the teen uprising of Tracy Austin, Andrea Jaeger, Zina Garrison and Seles.
Make that 10 players with Grand Slam credentials - very possibly the toughest era of all time in women's tennis, when the last four rounds were hardly ever a walkover and almost every final was keenly contested. Contrast that with fully 10 of Serena's major finals that were a simple two-set affair, including several in which she conceded three games, total.
Then go back to the 70s and there was Margaret Court, or Evonne Cawley, or Billie Jean King, or the young Evert, or the nascent Navratilova, or even our own Virginia Wade, winner of three Slams, don't forget. Another six genuine front-line contenders, five of them also in the 'greatest ever' conversation.
You couldn't pick five players today who would give Serena even a run for her money on a grass court. It is almost a lost art in men's tennis, let alone the women's event.
And yes, Serena, DOES have an impressive haul, and over a prolonged period. Only a handful of players can match her sustained productivity, notably Court, King, Navratilova and Evert. But Serena has yet to top them for longevity.
And yes, her 16 titles are a serious number. She is behind only Navratilova (18), Evert (18) and Graf (22) for Grand Slam wins in the Open era (and behind Court and Helen Wills Moody if you look further back). But she IS behind Martina, Chris and Steffi. In pure number terms, she doesn't figure in the top three.
You could also argue that Yesterday's Heroines never sent spectators running for cover with their hands over their ears like the current crop of shrieking harpies, but that's just a personal observation.
Graceless
Just to put the tin lid on it, though, none of the above-named players not called Serena ever bullied an umpire or an opponent the way the younger Williams has done on numerous occasions.
And none of them ever conducted themselves with the kind of graceless, me-first attitude we see all too often from the current world No1 (of which her truly classless comments about a 16-year-old rape victim earlier this week are just the latest example).
The likes of King, Navratilova and Seles also encountered MUCH tougher off-court issues than Serena will ever do. They tackled them head-on, without complaint and always with the touch of elegance and finesse that true champions display.
Serena Williams, the GOAT? Only if it stands for Greatest Over-rated Attitude in Tennis. And don't let any American commentator tell you otherwise.
If she gets to 19, you MIGHT put her ahead of Evert. If she gets to 23, you MIGHT put her ahead of Graf. But she could get 30 and she would NEVER be ahead of Navratilova. There has never been a champion of such sheer, unadulterated class, determination and will to win.
And it's unlikely there ever will be.

Thank you! this is exactly what I have been trying to say about this player for years (glad someone finally had the courage to do just that), and it's also exactly why I'm not the least bit interested in the women's game anymore. 
The men's field at the moment is 100 times more competitive with the top 4 constantly battling it out, too bad the women's game doesn't live up to the same standard.

Wednesday, January 04, 2012

Serena Williams "doesn't love tennis" big news or confirmation?


After winning her opening match of the 2012 tennis season, Serena Williams told reporters she doesn't love the sport in which she excels.


"I don't love tennis today but I'm here," she said after beating Chanelle Scheepers, 6-2, 6-3, in the first round of the Brisbane International.

"I can't live without it -- there's a difference between not loving something and not being able to live without it. I have never liked sports and could never understand how I became an athlete."

Serena went on to say that she doesn't like working out or training and that her 2012 schedule will be scaled back in order to provide her rest for big tournaments. The lighter slate also is intended to keep her motivated.

And therein these quotes lies the paradox that is Serena. From one view, her candor could be seen as refreshing. Here's a top athlete discussing the delicate balance of passion and obligation and fear of the unknown. She's revealing herself to the press, something she rarely has in the past.


Then you step back and realize Serena has the least self-awareness of any great athlete of the past decade. Two years later, she can't bring herself to acknowledge that she was wrong to threaten a lineswoman at the U.S. Open. She'll likely never admit her actions in last year's U.S. Open final crossed the line. Unless she gained some insight in the past four months, these quotes are selfish nonsense.


She's playing a lighter schedule in 2012? Since when has she ever played a full schedule? Even when she was a teenager, Serena never made it a secret that she focused on the big tournaments. There's nothing wrong with that. Let's not act as if this is some big sacrifice, though.


Nobody is surprised Serena doesn't like tennis. Like Andre Agassi before her, she seems to only love the winning and is willing to put up with what it takes to get there. The grind doesn't interest her much.

These aren't new insights into her soul. The underlying tone isn't that Serena is a reluctant sports hero, it's that she's able to be so much better than the rest of the tour without caring about the game like they do. 

Her "I don't love tennis" quote isn't a revelation, it's a self-congratulatory declaration.

It's as if she's saying,"Just imagine what I could do if I cared."

yahoo sports

Finally, someone has the courage to say what I have been saying for years when it comes to this player (only more eloquently).

The reason's above are exactly why I just cannot admire her skills as an athlete, or even appreciate anything she brings to the game.

The atrocious attitude just cancels everything out for me every time.  I actually do enjoy Venus quite a bit, who may not have as many trophies but is certainly the more humble and mature one of the two.

Reading this Serena pretty much confirmed what I've known for years she's always been in it for the accolades and the money nothing more.  Brings a bad reputation to the WTA really.

Articles like these just remind me why I love Roger Federer more and more.  The man is the epitome of tennis class, something Serena knows nothing about.



Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Serena puts her foot in her mouth once more @ U.S. Open

Serena Williams wasn’t a fan of one of the umpires overseeing her U.S. Open women’s final match Sunday.


The tennis star unleashed on chair umpire Eva Asderaki after getting called for violating an “intentional hindrance” rule during her match with Samantha Stosur.

During the first game of the second set, Williams yelled “Come on!” at the ball she’d served before it reached Stosur, but Asderaki called hindrance on Williams, which gave Stosur the break point – and the game.


Williams apparently was unaware of the rule. She first asked Asderaki if she was “the one who screwed me over last time? Yeah you are” – a reference to her getting penalized in 2009 after yelling at a line judge.
She later went off again (as transcribed by Gawker):


“If you ever see me walking down the hall, look the other way, because you're out of control... You're totally out of control, you're a hater, and you're unattractive inside. Who would do such a thing? And I never complain. Wow... We're in America last I checked. Can I get a water or am I gonna get violated for a water? Really, don't even look at me! I promise you, don't look at me, 'cause I am not the one. Don't look my way.”

THR.com



intentional hindrance Rickey.org by caseycarlsonx1


So I didn't bother watching the women's U.S. Open finals this past weekend and apparently this is what I missed.

Seriously?!.  You would think she had learned something from 2 years ago.

Word of advice Serena if you're going to commit the same offence at least do it at a different tournament.

And I can't believe her punishment was to pay $2000.

That's not even half the amount she payed the first time.

I guess this outburst wasn't deemed as life threatening seeing as she didn't use the words "kill you" in a sentence, but still.

The woman really needs to learn to rein in her ego, stop being a sore loser and just accept when she's being outplayed instead of taking it out on the officials.

They are just doing their job.


Friday, July 22, 2011

Martina Hingis trades wins with Serena in WTT

 Awww, it's kind of nice to see 2 old rivals getting along

Serena Williams and Martina Hingis renewed their rivalry for the first time in 9 years this week as they faced-off on back to back days at World Team Tennis in New York, with Serena representing the unbeaten Washington Kastles and Martina, the New York Sportimes. 

Their first meeting, which Serena took 5-3, was not broadcasted live but their second match was, and the score was reversed with Martina taking the match 5-3.

With Martina’s win over Serena, those who didn’t watch the match will undoubtedly call for her return back to the tour. On one hand it’s impossible to read into anything from World Team Tennis – not only does WTT not compare to professional tennis, but Serena put in an abysmal performance, barely bothering to move her feet and routinely dumping the ball straight into the bottom (and no, that’s not hyperbole in the slightest) of the net.

However, what we did see of Martina was quite promising. After storming to 4-1 she began to shank a lot of forehands and struggled to redirect a some of Serena’s big shots, but on the whole she was very consistent, with her inside-out backhand still coming up with a few glorious strokes while her trademark variety was brilliant as ever. 

I think there’s a misconception that Hingis’ game simply couldn’t handle power players, but her problem wasn’t simply that a lot of players hit the ball harder – it was that those players who did hit the ball hard in her time were the likes of the Williams sisters, Davenport, Pierce, Capriati and many more – some of the most exceptional big hitters the game will most likely ever see. 

But in the past 12 months, the likes of Wozniacki, Azarenka, Zvonareva and even Radwanska have proven that 2011 is a very different era from the early and even mid-00s, with the more pronounced use of power and risk breeding more inconsistency, and consistency is more than enough to ensure a spot in the top 20 and 10.

Even so, I think Martina made it clear that she was not considering a singles comeback. Mid-way through the match, she missed a backhand down the line and made a loud quip along the lines of; “and this why I’m not coming back”. Then, in the interview she spoke candidly about her heart “not (being) able to handle” more than the one-set layout of world team tennis. 

But still, after watching her in action during the Women’s doubles, a doubles return remains a must. In the presence of two other doubles legends still active on the tour, she put on a masterful display and was easily the best player on the court. If she doesn’t at least come back to doubles, it will be a huge waste of such great and rare talent.

My favourite moment of the tie had to be in the women’s singles as Martina turned the clock back to 2000, coming up with a trademark dropper-lob-dropper combo. Serena chased the first two down before narrowly missing the third and, unable to stop herself from crashing into the net, she hurdled over it onto Martina’s side of the court before doubling over with laughter. 

Martina, also laughing, then walked over to Serena and patted her sympathetically on the back. A nice moment between both two former bitter rivals and two great champions.

I've said it before and I'll say it again Martina's still got it! (even if she doesn't always think so).

I agree with the author I think she could really make a go of it in doubles (which is something I've also previously mentioned).  And I'm standing by it.

Thursday, July 08, 2010

Kim Clijsters wins over Serena Williams in Brussels

BRUSSELS — A world record tennis crowd has watched Kim Clijsters defeat Wimbledon champion Serena Williams 6-3, 6-2 in an exhibition in Brussels.

The crowd of 35,681 at King Baudouin Stadium on Thursday surpassed the previous record of 30,472 set in 1973 at the Houston Astrodome in the Battle of the Sexes match between Billie Jean King and Bobby Riggs.

Clijsters was originally scheduled to play Belgian Justine Henin, but Henin withdrew after injuring her elbow at Wimbledon. Top-ranked Williams agreed to replace Henin despite a foot injury.

The match was umpired by tennis great Martina Navratilova.

AP

Hell yes!. Note to tennis gods I would like a repeat of this for the U.S. Open please. Thank You.

It's really too bad for Justine.

Who I believe will now be out for 2 months no U.S. Open for her:(.

I was really looking forward to this exhibition battle (between the Belgians).

But at least the event still turned out successful.

Way to go Kim!.


Monday, May 03, 2010

Memorable Martina Moment: 2001 Australian Open Quarter Final



Sorry it's in German I can't seem to find one in English. This is by far one of my fave Serena/Hingis matches from their long rivalry over the years.

Excruciatingly long rallies, extraordinary shots, both players giving it their all, and completely exhausted at the end.

That's what tennis should be all about (but these days often falls short especially in the WTA). *sigh* I miss the good old days....

Saturday, February 06, 2010

Kim Clijsters vs Serena Williams exhibition rematch

New York, NY (Sports Network) - World No. 1 Serena Williams and former top- ranked star Kim Clijsters will meet in an exhibition tennis match at Madison Square Garden on March 1.

The reigning Australian Open and Wimbledon champion Serena and reigning U.S. Open titlist Clijsters will meet in a rematch of their U.S. Open semifinal from last year, which came to an abrupt end when Serena lost on a penalty point after berating a line judge at Ashe Stadium.

Clijsters went on to capture the U.S. Open, while the 12-time major champion Serena wound up being fined a record $82,500 and placed on two years probation at Grand Slam tournaments.

The BNP Paribas Showdown for the Billie Jean King Cup in New York will also feature a semifinal match between French Open champion Svetlana Kuznetsova and seven-time Grand Slam titlist and 2009 Wimbledon runner-up Venus Williams.

The $1.2 million one-day event will feature three matches, a pair of one-set semifinals and a three-set final at MSG.

Source: TSN


Tuesday, September 05, 2006

Momo beats Williams to get into the quarters

I actually don't like either one of these players, but out of the two I definitely prefer Mauresmo over Serena. I'm still rooting for Davenport and I think Mauresmo will be easier for Lindsay to beat then Serena.

Since she still seems to suffer those really bad game or should I say set lapses. That always seems to be the pattern with Mauresmo, she plays well at first and somewhere in the middle of the match she just drops out.

She won the first one easy 6/4 but completely went away in the second and got bagled 0/6. Then finally came back in the third set 6/2. And as much as I don't like Mauresmo I gotta give her credit she played a lot better then Serena, certainly moved a lot faster.

That's really the only reason I bothered to watch this match. I just wanted to see Mauresmo kick Serena's butt lol. I know sometimes I can be a total b* * * * lol.

Monday, August 28, 2006

Serena unworried about limited preparation

The title of this article says it all, but man I really don't like some of the comments she makes. That's probably a huge part of why I've never liked Serena she always comes off so full of herself.

Venus in my opinion is always a lot more humble, but Serena goes way overboard. It's mostly the last quote I have a problem with the "I haven't looked at the draw, I don't care it doesn't matter" bit sounds like she's totally sure she's gonna win the thing or something. I don't know it's just weird.

Personally I don't see her getting that far anyway especially now that Lindsay Davenport is back.

The only thing good about this article is the photo of Steffi and Andre.

And of course so you know what the heck I'm going on about here is the aforementioned article:
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/s/26082006/6/n-sports-serena-unworried-limited-preparation.html

Saturday, May 27, 2006

Williams and Pierce out of Roland Garros




Well, looks like it's more good news for Martina Hingis besides Serena Williams pulling out of the French Open with a chronic knee injury.

It seems that Mary Pierce has pulled out as well due to a groin injury. But I have to say I'm a little disappointed I was looking forward to seeing her play. I haven't seen her play in a while. Hopefully she'll be back for Wimbledon.

Serena has already announced that she's out of the Wimbledon grand slam as well. I really think this could be Martina's year, this could be the year she finally wins that illusive French Open title fingers crossed:).

Here are articles from TSN Canada confirming the news.

http://www.tsn.ca/tennis/news_story/?ID=166998&hubname=tennis
http://www.tsn.ca/tennis/news_story/?ID=167020&hubname=tennis