French Open staying at Roland Garros

PARIS (AP)—The French Tennis Federation voted to keep the French Open at its traditional Roland Garros venue and renovate the existing site by making it considerably larger, more attractive and modern, rather than moving it elsewhere.

Three other venues were bidding to host the clay-court Grand Slam tournament by 2016.

The proposed new sites at Versailles, close to the hugely popular Versailles palace, and in the suburbs at Gonesse and Marne-La-Vallee were much more expensive because they would have required building from scratch.

The FFT said Sunday that it had chosen the option of renovating Roland Garros, located in western Paris for more than 80 years, by making it 60 percent bigger while preserving its “unique history.”

“The Federation decided to stay on its original site at Porte d’Auteuil,” the FFT said Sunday. “It chose an ambitious, prestigious project resolutely looking to the future.”

The new-look Roland Garros will feature 35 outside courts, a new press center and a center court with a retractable roof so that matches could go ahead when it’s raining, and where night sessions could be played.

“Our ambition was to offer a project with a real future and of a very high quality,” FFT president Jean Gachassin said. “To improve the reception and the comfort of the players and spectators.”

Kim Clijsters, who will become the No. 1 player in the world on Monday, welcomed the news.
“I would have thought that it was sad to see it go away from the place where I know (the French Open) should be. … It has a lot of great memories for me even as a junior,” Clijsters said.

But former top-ranked player Amelie Mauresmo, now director of the Open Gaz de France tournament, thinks it should have moved.

“I hope they (the French Federation of Tennis) won’t get in trouble by taking this decision,” Mauresmo said. “I don’t know if the tennis aspect prevailed in that decision. I have some doubts. I clearly said that I was more in favor of a development, of an ambition, that is, to move.”

Cost issues also appear to have played a crucial part in the decision making.

The FFT said that renovation costs at Roland Garros are expected to be $370 million, compared to an estimated price tag of between $630 million and $1 billion for the three other potential venues.

Gonesse was eliminated in the first round of voting and Versailles in the second. In the final round, Roland Garros received 70.13 percent of the votes to eliminate Marne-La-Vallee.

“I would like to congratulate all the participants … most particularly (Paris) Mayor Bertrand Delanoe,” Gachassin said. “(Delanoe) has done an absolutely remarkable job to present a project in keeping with the international dimension of Roland Garros.”

Roland Garros is the smallest of the four Grand Slam venues that also include the Australian Open at Melbourne, the U.S. Open at Flushing Meadows in New York, and London’s traditional grass-court event at Wimbledon.

Fans and players have regularly complained about the congestion at Roland Garros because of its narrow walkways and the stiflingly limited size of the complex.

Plans call for an extension of the current site from 21.3 acres to about 33.8 acres.

Among the renovation options are a new adjacent stadium with a capacity of 8,000, and the use of other local infrastructure, such as the land at Stade Jean Bouin, where Stade Francais rugby club played its home games until the stadium was knocked down two years ago.

Local residents, wildlife enthusiasts and municipal authorities in Paris’ leafy western hub have all previously voiced their anger at the plans to refurbish Roland Garros.

Mauresmo has reservations that the pledge to mix modernity with tradition can work.

“If you can keep the history of the tournament in a place that is big enough to have the crowd happy, the players happy, night matches perhaps, matches when it’s raining, then that’s the perfect situation,” she said. “If you can keep tradition in these conditions, then it’s great. I’m not sure that’s the case with Roland Garros.”

Trung Latieule in Paris contributed to this report.

Yahoo Canada Sports

I blogged about this in March of last year at the time it looked like it was going to be cheaper to move it to a new venue. 

Interestingly it turned out to be the opposite.

Looks like unsurprisingly a lot of players are split on this decision.  The only thing I care about is whether they'll be able to implement all the changes and actually help improve it.

Although having only one retractable roof will make match scheduling a nightmare during rain delays.  But the 35 outside courts will be a great addition.

Hopefully more details will be released once they actually get closer to finalizing everything. 

Personally I'm still pulling for big screens outside the center court (ala Aussie Open/Wimbledon).